Geoff Lomax is CIRM's Senior Officer to the Standards Working Group
As a student of public health, I have
always been a believer in public science. Public science is critical for
providing sustained capacity for research. As others
have pointed out, this capacity translates into important commercial potential.
Historically, California has been a leader in investing in public science. From
its network of universities and various health-oriented agencies, the state
maintains a wealth of information, technical and human resources. Capacity such
as this lays the groundwork for innovation as researchers from varying
disciplines interact to imagine new ways forward.
One personally exciting conversation
that has emerged in the past couple of years is the role of stem cell science
in supporting our understanding of environmental influences on health and
disease. In fact, the National Institutes for Environmental Health Sciences has
begun to fund
research addressing the potential of environmental exposures to alter function,
proliferation, survival, and differentiation of stem cells (here is a link to that RFA). One area of particular
interest is the development of cellular systems to model the disease process.
As we reported in a report on a toxicology meeting, these model systems help us both understand disease and evaluate
therapies.
At CIRM, we thought it would be
informative to hear from one of our grantee institutions that has been
exploring this space. At a recent seminar, researchers from The Parkinson’s Institute reported on their work studying the relationship between
environmental influences and development of Parkinson’s disease. A novel study
in twins conducted by Samuel Goldman MD, MPH and Caroline M. Tanner, MD, PhD, from
The Parkinson’s Institute has found that exposure to trichloroethylene (TCE) –
a hazardous contaminant now found in soil, groundwater and air – can raise a
person’s risk of developing Parkinson’s disease by six times. That’s just one
of several contaminants and pesticides that increase risk of the disease.
The Parkinson’s Institute has taken
skin samples from patients with the disease and reprogrammed those into an
embryonic-like state. So far, they’ve developed 45 of these so-called induced
pluripotent stem cell lines (iPSCs). (Some of this work was done with a CIRM Early Translational Award.) In the process of developing these lines, researchers
collected information relating to environmental factors (job and residential
history, lifestyle and others) associated with health and disease. Dr. Birgitt Schuele
discussed ways in which these cells could be applied in future public health
research.
One
intriguing line of inquiry related to examining how pesticide exposure may be
associated with Parkinson’s disease risk. Goldman and Tanner reported on how
certain pesticides cause Parkinson’s disease in animal models and exposure is
also associated with disease in humans. Schuele suggested patient iPSCs are a
valuable tool for further studying this association and the disease process.
The idea is that the researchers can mature those cells into the cell type that
is associated with the disease—called dopaminergic neurons. Then they can
expose those neurons to the pesticide to see if the neurons show signs of the
disease in a lab dish. This is a critical way of learning about the effects of
compounds on human cell types.
This
type of research represents a way to leverage existing investments in
California’s unique information,
technical and human resources. For example, the state’s pesticide use reporting
and visionary investment in mapping
tools offers a unique opportunity to connect
basic research on disease with information relating to the distribution of
environmental agents. Thanks to a bill supported by then-Senator Art Torres
(now CIRM vice chair) California has the most comprehensive data on pesticide use
of any state. These resources have been used previously to study other disease
such as autism. Videos from a
seminar on the relationship between pesticide use and autism are available on CIRM’s YouTube channel.
The application of stem cell tools from
basic research towards public health and environmental protections represents a
critical avenue for health promotion and disease prevention. It’s personally
exciting to see CIRM grantees making use of public resources to carry out
science with such a potential for public good, and to have the NIEHS
recognizing the value of this research with their funding initiative.
G.L.




I have always been a believer in community science
ReplyDeleteHealth questionnaire